Vienola v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Gerald Alan Vienola
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2021cv00773
Filed: June 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 08/11/2021. By 9/27/2021, Defendant to serve on Plaintiff copy of proposed Notice of Mailing and Preservation of Rights and copy of the transcript of administrative proceedings. By 10/11/2021, parties to meet and confer in good faith effort to resolve matter. Plaintiff's brief due by 12/10/2021; Defendant's response due by 2/8/2022; Plaintiff's reply due by 2/22/2022. Briefs are subject to specified page limitations. No extensions of time for filing of briefs will be granted.(cc: all counsel)(bx)
August 9, 2021 Filing 8 PROPOSED Briefing Schedule filed by Commissioner of Social Security. (Godfrey, Jean)
August 5, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jean Marie Godfrey on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney(s) appearing: Jean Godfrey (Godfrey, Jean)
August 3, 2021 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Commissioner of Social Security. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 7/29/2021 GRANTING #3 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel)(jm)
July 29, 2021 Transmit Complaint and Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF (asc)
June 23, 2021 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Gerald Alan Vienola. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Skaar, Daniel)
June 23, 2021 Filing 3 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Gerald Alan Vienola. (Skaar, Daniel)
June 23, 2021 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Gerald Alan Vienola. (Skaar, Daniel)
June 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Gerald Alan Vienola. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Unfavorable Notice of Decision)(Skaar, Daniel)
June 23, 2021 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge J P Stadtmueller; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vienola v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Represented By: Jean Marie Godfrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gerald Alan Vienola
Represented By: Daniel A Skaar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?