Beske v. Kijakazi
| Mark Beske |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 1:2021cv00913 |
| August 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/17/21 that by December 13, 2021, the defendant file and serve the certified administrative record; by January 24, 2022, the plaintiff file a brief setting forth the specific errors allegedly committed at the administrative level which entitle the plaintiff to relief and stating the relief sought; by March 7, 2022, the defendant file a brief which responds specifically to each error raised by the plaintiff; and by March 22, 2022, plaintiff may file a brief which replies to the matters raised in the defendants brief. (cc: all counsel)(jad)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Catherine Leigh Gibbons on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi. Attorney(s) appearing: Catherine L. Gibbons (Gibbons, Catherine) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Kilolo Kijakazi. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 8/6/21 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel)(jad)
|
| Transmit #1 Complaint and #5 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Mark Beske. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Duncan, Dana) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Mark Beske. (Duncan, Dana) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Mark Beske. (Duncan, Dana) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Mark Beske (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Duncan, Dana) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Beske v. Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mark Beske | |
| Represented By: | Dana W Duncan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Represented By: | Catherine Leigh Gibbons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
