Anderson v. Bryant
Petitioner: James E Anderson
Respondent: Clinton Bryant
Case Number: 1:2022cv00021
Filed: January 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 BRIEF in Support filed by Clinton Bryant re #7 MOTION to Dismiss . (Held, Eliot)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Clinton Bryant. (Held, Eliot)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Eliot M Held on behalf of Clinton Bryant. Attorney(s) appearing: Eliot M. Held (Held, Eliot)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa E Kumfer on behalf of Clinton Bryant. Attorney(s) appearing: Lisa E.F. Kumfer (Kumfer, Lisa)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by James E Anderson. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pinix, Matthew)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY DOJ as to Clinton Bryant (Collins, Winn)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order TRANSMIT #1 Petition and #2 Screening Order to WI DOJ via email and electronic notice on 1/11/2022. (tlf)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 1/11/2022. The Clerk shall serve a copy of Petitioner's 2254 Petition and this order upon Respondent. Respondent shall either file an appropriate motion seeking dismissal or answer the petition within 60 days. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James E Anderson. ( Filing Fee PAID $5 receipt number AWIEDC-4012729) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Court of appeals decision on direct appeal, #3 Exhibit B - Supreme court decision on direct appeal, #4 Exhibit C - Court of appeals decision on postconviction, #5 Exhibit D - Supreme court decision on postconviction)(Pinix, Matthew)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge William C Griesbach; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (cmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James E Anderson
Represented By: Matthew S Pinix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Clinton Bryant
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas
Represented By: Eliot M Held
Represented By: Lisa E Kumfer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?