Lewandowski v. City of Manitowoc
Plaintiff: Robert Lewandowski
Defendant: City of Manitowoc
Case Number: 1:2022cv00049
Filed: January 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 6/21/2022 STRIKING #8 Proposed Amended Complaint. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(Griesbach, William)
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STRICKEN - See #9 Order. PROPOSED Amended Complaint filed by Robert Lewandowski. (tlf) Modified on 6/21/2022 (mac).
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 3/1/2022. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(Griesbach, William)
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William C Griesbach: Rule 16 Telephone Scheduling Conference held on 3/1/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 5/1/2022, Proponent Expert Witness List due by 6/1/2022, Rebuttal Expert Witness List due by 7/15/2022, Motions due by 9/1/2022, Rule 26(a) Disclosures to be exchanged by 4/15/2022. (Tape #030122) (mac)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Plan by City of Manitowoc. (Bolton, Richard) Modified on 2/28/2022 (mac).
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Hearing: Rule 16 Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 3/1/2022 10:00 AM before Judge William C Griesbach. Rule 26(f) Report due 2/22/2022. Counsel are to provide the telephone number at which they can be reached (direct dial preferred) at least two days prior to the telephone conference. In the event the pro se party or counsel are unavailable at the scheduled time of the telephone conference, the conference may be rescheduled and the pro se party and counsel may be required to appear in person. Please provide your telephone number to the Office of the Clerk at wied_clerks_gb@wied.uscourts.gov. (cc: all counsel and via U.S. Mail to pro se plaintiff)(Griesbach, William)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by City of Manitowoc.(Bolton, Richard)
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Robert Lewandowski. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (lh)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against City of Manitowoc filed by Robert Lewandowski. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge William E Duffin. (Filing Fee PAID ; GB4689-005908) (Service Packet Issued)(tlf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewandowski v. City of Manitowoc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Lewandowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Manitowoc
Represented By: Richard L Bolton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?