United States of America v. Approximately $10717 US Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $10717 US Currency
Case Number: 1:2022cv00214
Filed: February 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2022 Filing 12 LETTER from AUSA Bridget J. Schoenborn advising of United States' intention to move for default judgment. (Schoenborn, Bridget)
March 31, 2022 Filing 11 DECLARATION of Publication (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Advertisement Certification Report)(Schoenborn, Bridget)
March 14, 2022 Filing 10 US Marshal 285 Form returned executed as to warrant - defendant property in U.S. Marshal Service custody (Schoenborn, Bridget)
February 25, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE by United States of America to Alexandra Schroeder, c/o Attorney Schoenecker, of Complaint for Civil Forfeiture of Property (Schoenborn, Bridget)
February 25, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE by United States of America to Alexandra Schroeder (Fond du Lac Avenue address) of Complaint for Civil Forfeiture of Property (Schoenborn, Bridget)
February 25, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE by United States of America to Alexandra Schroeder (S. 7th Street address) of Complaint for Civil Forfeiture of Property (Schoenborn, Bridget)
February 25, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE by United States of America to Barbara Danison of Complaint for Civil Forfeiture of Property (Schoenborn, Bridget)
February 25, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE by United States of America to Nicholas Danison of Complaint for Civil Forfeiture of Property (Schoenborn, Bridget)
February 25, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE by United States of America to Roosevelt Robinson of Complaint for Civil Forfeiture of Property (Schoenborn, Bridget)
February 22, 2022 Filing 3 LETTER from AUSA Bridget J. Schoenborn to Clerk of Court. (Schoenborn, Bridget)
February 22, 2022 Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by United States of America. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Schoenborn, Bridget)
February 22, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Civil Forfeiture In Rem against Approximately $10717 US Currency by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Warrant for Arrest in Rem)(Schoenborn, Bridget)
February 22, 2022 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge William C Griesbach; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl)
February 22, 2022 Warrant for Arrest in Rem Issued. (tlf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $10717 US Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Bridget J Schoenborn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Approximately $10717 US Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?