Michels v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Rochelle L Michels
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 1:2022cv01137
Filed: September 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Referring Judge: Stephen C Dries
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 25, 2022 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Kilolo Kijakazi. (Tsui, Judy)
November 25, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Judy Tsui on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi. Attorney(s) appearing: Judy Tsui (Tsui, Judy)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/3/22. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries for all further proceedings. (cc: all counsel)(kmr)
October 3, 2022 Filing 5 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Defendant to file and serve certified administrative record by 11/28/22;Plaintiff's brief due 1/7/23;Defendant's response due 2/16/23;Plaintiff's reply due 3/3/23. (cc: all counsel) (kmr)
September 30, 2022 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Kilolo Kijakazi. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
September 29, 2022 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Rochelle L Michels. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Chewning, Donald)
September 29, 2022 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Rochelle L Michels. (Chewning, Donald)
September 29, 2022 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Rochelle L Michels ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4221872) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Appeals Council denial, #3 ALJ decision)(Chewning, Donald)
September 29, 2022 SERVICE OF COMPLAINT - Pursuant to the #Eastern District of Wisconsin's Memorandum of Understanding, the Commissioner and U.S. Attorney's Office have been electronically served with the Social Security appeal via CM/ECF. NOTICE to Plaintiff - Service on the Commissioner in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i) is not necessary unless the Commissioner requests otherwise. (asc)
September 29, 2022 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michels v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rochelle L Michels
Represented By: Donald J Chewning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Represented By: Judy Tsui
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?