Veasley v. Corwin et al
Romeo Denzell Veasley |
Clint Corwin, Luke Binter, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3 |
1:2023cv00132 |
February 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
William C Griesbach |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 2/27/2023. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(4), the plaintiff will not be required to pay an initial partial filing fee. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party and officer in charge) (Griesbach, William) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Romeo Denzell Veasley. (jmk) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Romeo Denzell Veasley. (jmk) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Romeo Denzell Veasley. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (jmk) |
Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to Romeo Veasley re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting payment of the full filing fee or that a petition to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee and six-month certified trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (lh) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against All Defendants by Romeo Denzell Veasley. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.