Yang v. Tan
Lee Yang |
Dr Egbert Tan |
1:2023cv00140 |
February 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
William C Griesbach |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 USCA Mandate (certified copy) as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Lee Yang; USCA Number 23-1263. The appeal is DISMISSED for failure to timely pay the required docketing fee, pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b) and for failure to comply with Circuit Rule 3(c). No record to be returned. (Attachments: #1 Certified Order) (kwf) |
Filing 13 CIRCUIT RULE 3(b) FEE NOTICE AND ORDER of USCA re #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Lee Yang. (lh) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 2/17/2023 denying #7 Motion for Leave to Appeal Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. Within 30 days of the date of this order, Yang shall forward to the Clerk of Court $505.00 for his appeal. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the appeal. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(Griesbach, William) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address as to Lee Yang (lh) |
Filing 10 USCA Case Number 23-1263 re: #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Lee Yang. (kwf) |
Filing 9 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #6 Notice of Appeal (mac) |
Filing 8 Pro Se Cover Letter re: #6 Notice of Appeal (mac) |
Copy of Pro Se Cover Letter #8 , Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to USCA #9 sent via U.S. Mail to Lee Yang with USCA forms (mac) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appeal Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Lee Yang. (mac) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Judgment, #4 Order by Lee Yang. (cc: all counsel) (mac) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk and approved by Judge William C Griesbach on 2/8/2023. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party) (kwf) |
Filing 4 SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 2/8/2023 GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. Yang's complaint #1 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party) (Griesbach, William) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Lee Yang. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (lh) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Lee Yang. (lh) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Egbert Tan filed by Lee Yang. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge Dries. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Yang v. Tan | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lee Yang | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dr Egbert Tan | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.