Burns v. Braatz et al
Christofer L Burns |
Matthew R Leusink, Scott Blader, Louis Braatz, Guy D Dutcher, Matthew Elliot and John Doe |
1:2023cv00831 |
June 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
William C Griesbach |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 6/26/2023. Judge Dutcher, Judge Blader, and District Attorney Leusink are dismissed as defendants from this case. This case is stayed pending resolution of Waushara County Case No. 2021CM189. The Clerk is directed to administratively close the case. It is Burns' responsibility to file a motion to reopen the case and lift the stay 30 days after the state court proceedings (including any post-conviction motions and other appellate relief) have concluded. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party) (Griesbach, William) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Christofer L Burns. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (lh) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Christofer L Burns. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge Duffin. Jury Demand (Filing Fee PAID $402.00; Receipt # GB 6170) (Service Packet Issued)(lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.