Pearson v. Stevens et al
| David A Pearson, Jr |
| Kevin A Carr, Christopher Stevens, C ODonnell, Jane/John Doe, Michael Schultz and Michelle Haese |
| 1:2023cv01426 |
| October 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William C Griesbach |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 12/19/2023. Kevin A. Carr, C. O'Donnell, and Jane/John Doe mental healthcare provider are DISMISSED based on Pearson's failure to state a claim against them. Christopher Stevens, Michael Schultz, and Michelle Haese shall file a responsive pleading to the complaint within sixty days of receiving electronic notice of this order. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party) (Griesbach, William) (Main Document 12 replaced on 12/20/2023) (lh).
|
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by David A Pearson, Jr.(mac) |
|
Filing 10
SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge William C. Griesbach on 11/29/2023. Pearson's #8 motion for leave to proceed without paying an initial partial file fee and his #2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are GRANTED. On or before, 12/29/2023, Pearson may file an amended complaint curing the defects in the original complaint as described in this decision. The Clerk's Office is to mail Pearson a blank prisoner amended complaint form and guide entitled "Answers to Prisoner Litigants' Common Questions" along with this order. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party and Officer in Charge)(Griesbach, William)
|
| Filing 9 LETTER from David A Pearson, Jr regarding insufficient funds to pay the filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Disbursement Request, #2 Interview/Information Request, #3 Envelope) (kwf) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Order for leave to proceed without paying the $6.02 initial partial filing fee by David A Pearson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Ex 1 Page of Trust Statement)(lh) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 11/13/2023. On or before 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $6.02 as an initial partial filing fee in this action. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party and officer in charge) (Griesbach, William)
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by David A Pearson, Jr. (mac) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by David A Pearson, Jr. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jmk) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to David Pearson Jr re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that the signed signature page of the complaint be filed within 21 days. (jmk) |
| Filing 3 Insufficient Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by David A Pearson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (jmk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by David A Pearson, Jr. (jmk) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against All Defendants by David A Pearson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jmk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/3/2023: #2 Signed Signature Page of Complaint) (jmk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
