Mahmoud v. O'Malley
Plaintiff: Wael Mahmoud
Defendant: Martin J O'Malley
Case Number: 1:2024cv00091
Filed: January 24, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Referring Judge: Stephen C Dries
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan C Hugo on behalf of Martin J O'Malley. Attorney(s) appearing: Megan C. Hugo (Hugo, Megan)
February 1, 2024 Filing 8 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Defendant to file and serve certified administrative record by 4/1/2024;Plaintiff's brief due 5/1/2024;Defendant's response due 5/31/2024;Plaintiff's reply due 6/14/2024. (cc: all counsel) (asc)
February 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 2/1/2024. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries for all further proceedings. Judge Lynn Adelman no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(amh)
February 1, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries. (asc)
January 29, 2024 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Martin J O'Malley. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
January 29, 2024 Notice of Service - Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has electronically notified via CM/ECF the Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the filing of this case. (asc)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 1/26/2024 GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel)(amh)
January 24, 2024 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Wael Mahmoud. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Duncan, Dana)
January 24, 2024 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Wael Mahmoud. (Duncan, Dana)
January 24, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Wael Mahmoud. (Duncan, Dana)
January 24, 2024 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Wael Mahmoud (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Duncan, Dana)
January 24, 2024 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (ams)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mahmoud v. O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wael Mahmoud
Represented By: Dana W Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin J O'Malley
Represented By: SSA - Office of the General Counsel
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Represented By: Megan C Hugo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?