S v. School Bd Milwaukee, et al
| Jamie S, Biagio R, Bryan E and Melanie V |
| Milwaukee Public Schools, Milwaukee Board of School Directors and William Andrekopolous |
| 2:2001cv00928 |
| July 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Aaron E Goodstein |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
708
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 8/20/2012: GRANTING 680 MOTION for judgment on the pleadings filed by defendants; GRANTING 682 MOTION to vacate order granting interim attorneys' fees and for restitution of attorneys ' fees filed by Milwaukee Public Schools; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 677 MOTION for restitution of attorneys' fees filed by Department of Public Instruction; DENYING 701 MOTION to strike state defendants' reply brief filed by plaintiffs. Matter is DISMISSED. Clerk of Court directed to enter judgment accordingly. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
|
Filing
675
DECISION and ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on 4/20/2012. Written discovery deadline is 10/19/2012; Deadline for lay witness depositions is 12/212012; Deadline for naming expert witnesses is 1/22/2013; Deadline for exchanging expert reports is 2/22/2013; Deadline for expert witness depositions is 3/22/2013; and Deadline for dispositive motions is 5/22/2013. (cc: all counsel)(nts)
|
|
Filing
622
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Aaron E Goodstein on 7/22/2009 DENYING 618 Motion to Stay. (cc: all counsel) (Goodstein, A.)
|
|
Filing
598
DECISION AND ORDER FOLLOWING PHASE III, signed by Magistrate Judge Aaron E Goodstein on 6/9/2009 DENYING 559 Motion for Declaratory Order. It is the conclusion of the court that MPS' systemic failures to meet its Child Find obligations necess itates an individualized evaluation of all class members to determine whether compensatory services are appropriate for a resulting denial of FAPE, and accordingly, the court hereby orders the remedy set forth herein. The next step of this litigation requires the parties to meet in a good faith effort to reach an agreement as to certain essential matters set forth above. Therefore, no later than July 24, 2009, the parties shall submit joint proposals detailing the means that shall be used to pr ovide individual and general notice to potential class members, as well as the contents of any proposed notice. If after good faith efforts, the parties are unable to reach a mutual agreement, the parties shall each submit separate proposals. Furthe r, no later than July 24, 2009, the parties shall submit jointly the name, curriculum vitae, affidavit pursuant to Rule 53(b)(3)(a), and information indicating the terms under which the independent monitor shall be compensated for the proposed independent monitor. If after good faith efforts, the parties are unable to reach a mutual agreement, the parties shall each submit such information for up to two proposed independent monitors. (cc: all counsel) (Goodstein, A.)
|
|
Filing
588
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Aaron E Goodstein on 1/20/2009 denying 579 Motion to Exclude; denying 579 Motion to Modify. However, now facing a revised remedy with substantially more detail does warrant the granting of additional time for a reply by MPS. The court will extend the date for reply. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that the parties' Phase III reply briefs shall be filed on February 9, 2009. The Rule 7.4 motion of MPS is hereby denied. (cc: all counsel) (Goodstein, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
