Ruleau v. Endicott
Case Number: 2:2005cv01105
Filed: October 18, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
Presiding Judge: Patricia J Gorence
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 76 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia J Gorence on 1/17/2012. The respondent's motion to authorize transfer of custody of petitioner Ruleau be and hereby is granted. (Docket #75). The respondent shall transfer the petitioner to the Chippewa Valley Correctional Treatment Facility, with a one-day stop at the Dodge Correctional Institution, and that the transfer shall begin no later than 2/14/2012. The respondent shall notify the court within one week of the completion of t he transfer so that the court may substitute the proper respondent in this action. Superintendent DeWayne Street issubstituted as the respondent in this action. (cc: all counsel, Superintendent at TCC and petitioner via USPS, ) (mlm) Modified on 1/18/2012 (mlm).
October 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 67 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia J Gorence on 10/24/2011. The petitioners petition for a writ of habeas corpus be and hereby is denied. (cc: all counsel)(mlm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruleau v. Endicott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?