Isom v. Schneiter

Petitioner: John E Isom
Respondent: Richard S Schneiter
Case Number: 2:2007cv00047
Filed: January 16, 2007
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Milwaukee
Presiding Judge: William E Callahan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 23, 2007 4 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ON RULE 4 REVIEW signed by Magistrate Judge William E Callahan Jr on 1/23/07. Respondent's answer due 3/16/07. Respondent's brief in response to petitioner's memorandum of law due 4/15/07. Petitioner's reply brief due 5/15/07. (cc: Petitioner (Order & consent/refusal form), AAG Weber & Warden (petition, brief, exhibits, Order & consent/refusal form) via US Mail)(rz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Isom v. Schneiter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John E Isom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Richard S Schneiter
Represented By: Marguerite M Moeller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?