Lynch v. Canteen Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Rufus L Lynch
Defendant: Canteen Corrections, Flowers Foods Specialty Group, Flowers Baking Company and George E Deese
Case Number: 2:2008cv00554
Filed: June 27, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Milwaukee
Presiding Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 8/31/11 as follows: granting 97 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by George E. Deese, Flowers Bakery of London and Flowers Foods Specialty Group; granting 98 Compass Group USA, Inc.'s Motion for Su mmary Judgment; denying 104 Motion for Summary Judgment by George E. Deese, Flowers Bakery of London and Flowers Foods Specialty Group; granting 105 Second Motion for Summary Judgment by George E. Deese, Flowers Bakery of London and Flowers Foods Specialty Group; denying 115 plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Motion for Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. See Order. (cc: plaintiff, all counsel) (nm)
March 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 3/3/11 as follows: denying as moot 79 Motion for Extension of Time to complete discovery; denying 79 plaintiff's Motion to File motion to compel and to obtain affidavits from witnesses; denying 88 plaintiff's Motion to Compel and for in camera review; denying as moot 106 plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time; denying without prejudice 106 plaintiff's renewed Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 107 defendant Compass Group USA Inc.'s Motion to Compel and for Sanctions; denying 108 plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time; denying 108 plaintiff's renewed Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting 110 plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to file response to defendants' motion for summary judgment; and, granting 120 defendant Compass Group USA, Inc.'s Motion for Extension of Time to respond. See Order. (cc: plaintiff, all counsel) (nm)
February 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 2/25/10 as follows: denying 21 defendants' Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 26 plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint; denying 32 defendants' Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 40 plai ntiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint; granting 51 plaintiff's Amended Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and to Dismiss Flowers Baking Co.; the Clerk of Court shall docket the proposed amended complaint attached to plaintiff's 12/22/09 motion for leave to amend as the "Amended Complaint" in this action; the following parties will be dismissed as parties to this action: Flowers Baking Co., and Canteen Corrections; the specified defendants shall f ile a responsive pleading to the plaintiffs Amended Complaint on or before 3/22/10; denying without prejudice 42 Canteen Corrections' Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment; denying without prejudice 46 defenda nts' Amended Motion to Dismiss Party George E. Deese; denying without prejudice 48 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 52 plaintiff's Motion to Stay defendants' summary judgment motion and allow plaintiff to complete discovery; granting 61 defendant Canteen Correction's Motion to Strike; striking 57 plaintiff's Amended Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and to Dismiss Flowers Baking Co.; and, striking 60 plaintiff's Motion to Stay defendants' summary judgment motion and allow plaintiff to complete discovery. (cc: plaintiff, all counsel) (nm)
April 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 4/6/09 granting 9 plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and ordering as follows: the U.S. Marshals Service shall serve a copy of the complaint, summons and this order upon the defen dants; the defendants shall file a responsive pleading to the complaint; the balance of the filing fee shall be paid from the plaintiff's prison trust account in monthly payments as specified. See Order. (cc: plaintiff, Warden of Columbia Correctional Institution, AAG Corey F. Finkelmeyer, all counsel)(nm)
January 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 1/8/09 directing the plaintiff to forward to the Clerk of Court on or before 1/29/09 the sum of $15.32 as an initial partial filing fee in this action or, in the alternative, notify the court on or before 1/29/09 that he does not wish to prosecute this action. See Order. (cc: Warden of Columbia Correctional Institution, AAG Corey F. Finkelmeyer, plaintiff, all counsel)(nm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lynch v. Canteen Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rufus L Lynch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Canteen Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flowers Foods Specialty Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flowers Baking Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George E Deese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?