Hackl et al v. Icon Health & Fitness Inc et al
Plaintiff: Therese A Hackl and Richard Hackl
Defendant: Icon Health & Fitness Inc, Sears Roebuck & Co and Unknown
Involuntary Plaintiff: United Healthcare of Wisconsin
Case Number: 2:2008cv00871
Filed: October 15, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office
County: Milwaukee
Presiding Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 6/8/10 denying 55 defendants' Motion to Exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Berry, and denying 63 plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on liability. See Order. (cc: all counsel) (nm)
June 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 44 PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 6/16/09 specifying the terms that shall control confidential information produced or disclosed during the discovery and/or trial of this matter. See Order. (cc: all counsel)(nm)
May 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 5/27/09 granting 22 plaintiffs' motion to amend the complaint. (cc: all counsel) (nm)
May 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 5/7/09 denying without prejudice 20 the Stipulation for a Protective Order filed by defendants Icon Health & Fitness Inc. and Sears Roebuck & Co. See Order. (cc: all counsel)(nm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hackl et al v. Icon Health & Fitness Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Therese A Hackl
Represented By: Patrick C Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Hackl
Represented By: Patrick C Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Involuntary plaintiff: United Healthcare of Wisconsin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Icon Health & Fitness Inc
Represented By: Pamela M Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sears Roebuck & Co
Represented By: Pamela M Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?