Gallagher v. UNUM
Plaintiff: Alison Gallagher
Defendant: UNUM
Case Number: 2:2009cv00069
Filed: January 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Insurance Office
County: Milwaukee
Presiding Judge: Charles N Clevert
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS 13 , DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS FIRST MOTION 6 AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE signed by Chief Judge Charles N Clevert, Jr on 2/22/10. (cc: all counsel) (C.N. Clevert, Jr.)(dm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gallagher v. UNUM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alison Gallagher
Represented By: Phillip J Ramthun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNUM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?