Rodriguez v. Pollard et al
Plaintiff: Tomas Rodriguez
Defendant: William J Pollard, Richard Heidorn, MD, Jeananne Greenwood and Michael Baenen
Case Number: 2:2009cv00090
Filed: January 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement Office
County: Brown
Presiding Judge: Patricia J Gorence
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia J Gorence on 3/17/2011 denying plaintiff's 24 Motion for Reconsideration. (cc: all counsel, sent to plaintiff via USPS) (mlm)
December 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia J Gorence on 12/16/10. IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim. The Clerk of Cour t document that this inmate has brought an action that was dismissed for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. §§1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). The Clerk of Court enter judgment accordingly, and that any appeal from this matter would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) unless the plaintiff offers bonafide arguments supporting his appeal. (cc: all counsel, copy mailed to plaintiff)(mlm)
November 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia J Gorence on 11/02/09 granting plaintiff permission to file a second amended complaint on or before 12/01/09. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint by 12/01/09 this action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Cys. of this order sent to institution where inmate is confined & to Wisconsin Dept of Justice. (cc: all counsel)(jac, Patricia J Gorence)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Pollard et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tomas Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William J Pollard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Heidorn, MD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeananne Greenwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Baenen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?