Hardy v. CertainTeed Corporation et al
| Earline Hardy |
| CertainTeed Corporation, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC, General Electric Company, General Refractories Company, Georgia-Pacific LLC, Maremont Corporation, Owens-Illinois Inc, Rapid American Corp and Union Carbide Corp |
| 2:2009cv00355 |
| April 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| P.I. : Asbestos Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 10/30/09 dismissing without prejudice 1 the complaint against defendants Rapid American Corp, Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC and Maremont Corporation. See Order. (cc: all counsel)(nm)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 10/7/09 that plaintiff shall have 20 days from the date of this order to provide good cause for the failure to timely serve, or provide proof of service on or waiver of service on defendants Garlock Sealing T echnologies, Maremont Corporation and Rapid American Corporation and move for default judgment if no responsive pleading is filed by defendants; failure to do so will result in the court dismissing this action without prejudice as it pertains to these defendants. (cc: all counsel)(nm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
