Andrews et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Plaintiff: Frank J Andrews, Jr and David Stroud
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Case Number: 2:2009cv00718
Filed: July 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Rudolph T Randa
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 149 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 11/13/2012 GRANTING 140 Motion to clarify; settlement agreement's provision regarding personal financial statements means Andrews and Stroud must provide information sufficient to enable the Bank to lo cate assets described in those statements and to confirm that Andrews and Stroud pay over to the Bank net proceeds of the sale of their assets; 18-month forebearance period on execution of the stipulated judgment commenced 6/11/2012. (cc: all counsel) (cb)
May 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on 5/4/2012 Granting in part and Denying in part 120 Motion in Limine; Denying 122 Motion to Amend the scheduling order/strike the jury demand. Directing the Clerk of Court to amend the docket sheet of this case to reflect that JP Morgan's third-party complaint against Milwaukee Mile Holdings and Milwaukee Mile Marketing was dismissed, see ECF No. 118 at 2. (cc: all counsel) (nts)
February 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on 02/17/2012 denying 75 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 111 Motion to Dismiss the Amended Third-Party Complaint. The trial in this matter is scheduled to commence on 06/11/2012. Motions in limine must be filed on or before 04/13/2012. Responses are due on 04/27/2012. The Court will not consider reply briefs. (cc: all counsel) (Koll, J)
January 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on 1/13/2012. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1653, the parties must cure their defective jurisdictional allegations within 10 days of the date of this Order. If the parties do nothing within that time frame, this matter will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. (cc: all counsel)(nts)
May 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T Randa on 05/12/2010 denying 13 Motion to Dismiss; denying 32 Motion to Dismiss; granting 36 Motion to Amend/Correct. (cc: all counsel) (Koll, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrews et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank J Andrews, Jr
Represented By: Sean D Lanphier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Stroud
Represented By: Sean D Lanphier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?