Williams v. Howard et al
| Ricky L Williams |
| Stephen Howard, Leslie Gombus and Scott Hoftiezer |
| 2:2010cv00168 |
| March 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Brown |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 3/4/12 that plaintiffs claims against Leslie Gombus are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further granting 50 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff) (dm)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 4/19/11 granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion to Compel; denying without prejudice 46 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Further ordering defendants to supplement their discovery responses, consistent with this Order, on or before Monday, May 2, 2011. (cc: all counsel,via USPS to plaintiff) (dm)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 1/7/11 denying 14 Motion to Substitute Party; denying as moot 31 Motion for failure to make timely compliance and denying without prejudice 37 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff) (Adelman, L.)(dm)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 5/22/10 finding as moot 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See order for instructions. (cc: plaintiff, warden, all counsel) (Wesolek, Marie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
