Butler v Meyers, et al
Don Juan Butler |
Sgt Meyers, Leeman, Lawler, John Doe and Jane Doe |
2:2010cv00653 |
August 2, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Columbia |
Patricia J Gorence |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia J Gorence on 3/23/2012 granting defendants' 82 Motion for Summary Judgment. (cc: all counsel, to plaintiff via USPS) (mlm) |
Filing 74 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia J Gorence on 8/3/2011. The plaintiffs motion to subpoena witnesses be and hereby is denied without prejudice. (Docket #65) The plaintiff's letter of objection be and hereby is denied. (Docket #67). (cc: all counsel, Mr. Butler via USPS) (mlm) |
Filing 59 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia J Gorence on 6/28/2011. The plaintiffs motion to compel discovery is hereby denied. (Docket #51) The United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint, the summons, and this order upon defendants Mr. Henderson, Sgt. Dickau, and Mr. Holt pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The defendants Mr. Henderson, Sgt. Dickau, and Mr. Holt shall file a responsive pleading to the complaint. The defendants John Doe and Jane Doe are hereby dismissed. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff via USPS) (mlm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.