Six Star Holdings LLC v. City of Milwaukee
Plaintiff: Six Star Holdings LLC
Defendant: City of Milwaukee
Case Number: 2:2010cv00893
Filed: October 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Waukesha
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 165 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/5/15 granting 138 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 158 Supplemental Motion for Attorney Fees to the extent that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover from the City of Milwaukee $425,553.50 in attorneys fees and $57,033.07 in costs and out-of-pocket expenses, for a total award of $482,586.57. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
February 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 118 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 2/19/15 granting 109 Motion for Nominal Damages. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
August 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 87 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 8/28/13 that the Citys motion for summary judgment on Ferols claims involving the theater and public entertainment club ordinances is DENIED. Further ordering that Ferols motion for partial summary judgment on its claims involving the theater and public entertainment club ordinances is GRANTED to the extent that if Ferol establishes at trial that it would have operated a dry gentlemens clubbut for the existence of the theater and public entert ainment club ordinances, it will be entitled to recover damages for the period in which the ordinances prevented it from doing so. FINALLY, ordering an in-person status conference to be held on 9/27/2013 at 3:00 p.m. to schedule further proceedings. (cc: all counsel)(dm)
March 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 78 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 3/18/13 granting in part and denying in part 43 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 53 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary judg ment is granted to the City on plaintiffs claims involving the tavern and tavern-amusement ordinances. Summary judgment is granted to Six Star on the issue of the Citys liability for damages relating to Six Stars inability to offer erotic dance ente rtainment without also serving alcohol at the Old World Third location. Further, granting 48 , 54 Motions for Leave to File Excess Pages. Further setting status conference for 4/11/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 390, 517 E Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53202 before Judge Lynn Adelman. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Six Star Holdings LLC v. City of Milwaukee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Six Star Holdings LLC
Represented By: Jeff Scott Olson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Milwaukee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?