Powers v. Thurmer
Jacob Alan Powers |
Michael Thurmer |
2:2010cv01127 |
December 14, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Dodge |
Charles N Clevert |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 142 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 5/23/2024. The petition Jacob A. Power's second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. The court issues a certificate of appealability as to his due process and ineffective assistance of counsel claims. (cc: all counsel)(mlm) |
Filing 116 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 5/5/2023. The court's stay is vacated. Attorney Brian P. Mullins is discharged as counsel for Powers, and successor counsel shall be promptly appointed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2 )(B). The Clerk shall schedule a telephonic status conference with all counsel in approximately 60 days. Counsel should be prepared to discuss setting a schedule for concluding this case. (cc: all counsel, copy to Mr. Powers at KMCI via USPS)(mlm) Modified on 5/5/2023 (mlm). |
Filing 114 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 5/27/2021. The petitioner Jacob Powers's request that the court appoint substitute counsel is denied. (cc: all counsel, to petitioner via USPS )(mlm) |
Filing 108 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is stayed and Powers's petition is held in abeyance pending the exhaustion of his state court remedies. Within 45 days of the date of this order Powers must initiate proceedings in state court to exhaust his state court remedies. (cc: all counsel)(asc) |
Filing 31 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia J Gorence on 11/23/2011. The petitioner shall file a brief addressing whether he can overcome his procedural default by showing either cause for the default and actual prejudice resulting from the default or that enforcing the default would lead to a fundamental miscarriage of justice on or before 12/23/2011. The respondent shall file a responsive brief on or before 1/23/2012, and the petitioner shall file a reply brief onor before 2/8/20 12. The respondents Motion to Stay Time for Filing anAnswer to Petition Pending Disposition of the Respondents Motion to Dismiss be and hereby is denied. (Docket #23). The petitioners Motion to Stay be and hereby is denied. (Docket #24). The petitioners Motion to Dismiss his habeas petition without prejudice be and hereby is denied. (Docket # 28) (cc: all counsel, petitioner via USPS) (mlm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Powers v. Thurmer | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jacob Alan Powers | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Michael Thurmer | |
Represented By: | Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.