Valoe et al v. American Cyanamid Co et al
| Deziree Valoe and Detareion Valoe |
| American Cyanamid Co, Armstrong Containers Inc, EI Dupont Denemours & Company, NL Industries Inc, The Atlantic Richfield Company and The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| 2:2011cv00425 |
| May 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Milwaukee |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
326
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 3/2/22 that defendant Armstrong's motion for joinder 280 is GRANTED. Defendant Atlantic Richfield's motion for summary judgment 270 is GRANTED. Defendant Sherwin-Williams' motion for summary judgment at 274 is GRANTED. Defendant Du Pont's motion for joinder 277 is GRANTED. Defendant Sherman-Williams' motion for judicial notice 303 is DENIED AS MOOT. (cc: all counsel)(jad)
|
|
Filing
268
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 3/22/21 denying 246 Motion to Disqualify Judge; granting 255 Motion for Leave to File. (cc: all counsel)(jad)
|
|
Filing
234
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 11/8/19 granting 199 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
|
|
Filing
156
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 7/5/16 that plaintiffs motions to partially consolidate (No. 07-cv-0303, 331 ; No. 07-cv-0441, 295 ; No. 07-cv-0864, 289 ; No. 07-cv-0865, 270 ; No. 10-cv-0075, 196 ; No. 11-cv-0055, 169 ; No. 11-cv-0425, 121 ; No. 14-cv-1423, 83 are GRANTED. The above-captioned cases are consolidated for the limited purpose of resolving the pending motion for a protective order. Further ordering that plaintiffs motions for a protective order (No. 07-c v-0303, 332 ; No. 07-cv-0441, 296 ; No. 07-cv-0864, 290 ; No. 07-cv-0865, 271 ; No. 10-cv-0075, 197 ; No. 11-cv-0055, 170 ; No. 11-cv-0425, 122 ; No. 14-cv-1423, 84 are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs shall produce copies of t he settlement agreements and releases for in camera review within 14 days of this order. Plaintiffs may redact the settlement amount from the copies produced for review. Further ordering that defendants motions for leave to file a sur-reply (No. 07- cv-0303, 342 ; No. 07-cv-0441, 305 ; No. 07-cv-0864, 300 ; No. 07-cv-0865, 280 ; No. 10-cv-0075, 207 ; No. 11-cv-0055, 180 ; No. 11-cv-0425, 132 ; No. 14-cv-1423, 94 are GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall file defendants proposed sur-reply in each of the above-captioned cases. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
|
|
Filing
135
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 1/26/16 denying 118 Motion For Certification of the Court's Decision on Personal Jurisdiction Under 28 U.S.C. §1292(b). (cc: all counsel) (dm)
|
|
Filing
117
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/15/15 denying 49 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 52 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 56 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 59 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 61 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
|
|
Filing
87
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 7/15/15 granting 79 Motion to Consolidate Cases. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 11/10/14 granting 35 Motion to Consolidate Cases for settlement purposes; granting 36 Motion for Settlement; granting 37 Motion for Settlement. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
