SC Johnson & Son Inc v. Nutraceutical Corporation et al
Plaintiff: SC Johnson & Son Inc
Defendant: Nutraceutical Corporation and NutraMarks Inc
Case Number: 2:2011cv00861
Filed: September 12, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Racine
Presiding Judge: Rudolph T Randa
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 151 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 3/22/2019. 119 Defendants' motion for judgment consistent with the Seventh Circuit's opinion GRANTED. Defendants AWARDED $232,000 in disgorged profits. 130 Defendant's motion for attorney fees GRANTED; defendants AWARDED $630,449.82 in attorney fees. 148 Plaintiff's motion to restrict GRANTED; Clerk of Court to RESTRICT document at dkt. no. 149-1 to court and case participants until further order of the court. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
July 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 7/17/2018. By 8/17/2018 plaintiff to provide the court with proposed amount for damages award. See order for details. By 8/17/2018 parties to submit simultaneous, supplemental briefs on question of whether Octane Fitness applies to attorneys' fees under the Lanham Act and how its application impacts defendants' motion for attorneys' fees. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
September 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/29/2017 DENYING 124 Motion to Restrict Document, But Giving the Plaintiff An Opportunity to Show Cause. The clerk of courts shall restrict the briefs (Dkt. Nos. 120-1 and 125-1) such that only the parties and the court may view the un-redacted versions only until October 20, 2017. Please see order for further details. (cc: all counsel) (kgw)
September 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 9/22/2015 DENYING 98 Defendants' Motion to Alter Judgment/Relief from Judgment. (cc: all counsel) (cb)
September 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 9/25/2014. 91 Defendants' Motion to Stay DENIED as to paragraph 1 and GRANTED as to paragraph 2 of the injunction. See Order for details. (cc: all counsel) (cb)
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 9/18/2014. By 9/24/2014 Defendants' to file their Rule 59 motion and Plaintiff to file statement indicating appropriate terms for its security if injunction is stayed. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
August 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 8/29/2014. Plaintiff has prevailed on Lanham Act and common law unfair competition claims against Defendants; Defendants' counterclaims DISMISSED with prejudice; Plaintiff GRANTED a permanent injunction against Defendants (see Order for details); this action is TERMINATED. Plaintiff may file bill of costs with Clerk of Court. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 1/14/2014. 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment DENIED. 42 MOTION to Seal GRANTED as to [45-44] Exhibit U and DENIED as to other exhibits; Clerk of Court DIRECTED to unseal [45-39] Exhibit K, [45-40] Exhibit L Part 1, [45-41] Exhibit L Part 2, [45-42] Exhibit M, [45-43] Exhibit N, [45-45] Exhibit Y, [45-46] Exhibit BB, [45-47] Exhibit CC; [45-48] Exhibit EE, [45-49] Exhibit FF, [45-50] Exhibit GG, [45-51] Exhibit JJ and [45-52] Exhibit KK. 54 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment GRANTED; Clerk of Court DIRECTED to file [54-1] proposed sur-reply brief. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 8/20/2013 DENYING 34 Motion to Seal Document. (cc: all counsel) (cb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SC Johnson & Son Inc v. Nutraceutical Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SC Johnson & Son Inc
Represented By: Cheryl L Burbach
Represented By: Jonathan H Margolies
Represented By: Katherine W Schill
Represented By: Dianne M Smith-Misemer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nutraceutical Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NutraMarks Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?