Kacmarcik v. Carrier IQ Inc et al
Andy Kacmarcik |
Carrier IQ Inc, Sprint Nextel Corporation, HTC Corporation and HTC America Inc |
2:2011cv01119 |
December 9, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Racine |
Rudolph T Randa |
Other Statutory Actions |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Due to the non-consent of the parties this case has been randomly reassigned to Judge Rudolph T Randa. Magistrate Judge Aaron E Goodstein no longer assigned to the case. |
Summons Issued as to Carrier IQ Inc, HTC America Inc, HTC Corporation and Sprint Nextel Corporation (vkb) |
Filing 3 Refusal to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by All Plaintiffs. |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Aaron E Goodstein ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Goodstein to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our web site. |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by All Plaintiffs. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against All Defendants by Andy Kacmarcik. ( Filing Fee PAID $350 receipt number 0757-1403609) (Attachments: # 1 Summons for Defendant Carrier IQ, Inc., # 2 Summons for Defendant HTC Corporation, # 3 Summons for Defendant HTC America, Inc., # 4 Summons for Defendant Sprint Nextel Corporation, # 5 Civil Cover Sheet) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.