Jackson v Hoftiezer et al
| Keith Jackson |
| Scott Hoftiezer, Beth Dittmann, Jen Koehler, Jane Doe, Sgt Heller, Timothy Lundquist and Rick Raemisch |
| 2:2012cv00058 |
| January 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Winnebago |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
167
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 11/9/15 denying 164 Motion for Order. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff) (dm)
|
|
Filing
156
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 8/31/15 that plaintiff forward settlement proceeds from this case to the Clerk of Court to be invested in the Court Registry Investment System. Further ordering that upon plaintiffs release from custody he must seek a court order to disburse the funds. (cc: all counsel, financial)(dm)
|
|
Filing
124
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/10/13 granting in part and denying in part 66 Motion for Summary Judgment. Further ordering that Beth Dittmann and Sgt. Heller are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as defendants to this action. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff) (dm)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 5/20/13 that plaintiffs request for specific work schedule of specific employees 100 is DENIED. Further ordering that plaintiff may supplement his response to the defendants motion for summary judgment and/or file his own motion for summary judgment by Monday, June 10, 2013. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff)(dm)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 4/2/13 denying 53 Motion for Order; denying without prejudice 55 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 60 Motion for Order; granting 62 Motion for Extension of Time; granting 64 Motion to Compel; den ying 87 Motion to Strike; denying 90 Motion for Extension of Time. Further, defendants shall respond to the interrogatories at Docket 48 through 52 and the request for production of documents at Docket 58 , or file a letter advising the court of when they responded by 4/30/13. Plaintiff may supplement his response to defendants motion for summary judgment or file his own motion for summary judgment by 5/31/13.(cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff) (dm)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 8/15/12 granting 36 Motion to Amend/Correct. Kim LeBreck, RN is substituted for the defendant previously identified as Nurse Jane Doe; denying 42 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 27 Motion to Compel; denying without prejudice 31 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Further ordering that Kim LeBreck should be served pursuant to the informal service agreement between the Wisconsin Department of Justice and this court. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff) (dm)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 3/14/12 granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Further ordering that Rick Raemisch and Warden Timothy Lundquist are DISMISSED as defendants in this action. Plaintiff shall update the court regarding his attempts to identify Nurse Jane Doe on or before 4/30/12. Further ordering defendants respond to the complaint within sixty days of receiving electronic notice of this order. Further ordering that the balance of the filing fee in the amount of $337.00 is to be collected as set forth in the order. (cc: WDOJ, via USPS to plaintiff, Warden-OCI)(dm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
