Scott v. Clarke

Scott v. Clarke

Plaintiff:	Demetric Scott
Defendant:	John Clarke
Case Number:	2:2012cv00198
Filed:	February 27, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office:	Milwaukee Office
County:	Dodge
Presiding Judge:	Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 21, 2012	Filing 11 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 3/21/12 granting 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot 4 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Further ordering that this action be and hereby is DISMISSE D for failure to state a claim. Further ordering that the Clerk of Court document that this inmate has brought an action that was dismissed for failure to state a claim and that this inmate has incurred a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. §1915 (g). Further ordering that the Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections or his designee shall collect from plaintiff's prison trust account the $342.52 balance of the filing fee as designated in the order and that the Clerk of Court enter judgment accordingly. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff, Warden-WCI, AAG Corey Finkelmeyer) (dm)
March 7, 2012	Filing 10 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 3/7/12 that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of this Court the sum of $7.48 as an initial partial filing fee in this action. (cc: via USPS to plaintiff)(dm)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 21, 2012

Filing 11 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 3/21/12 granting 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot 4 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Further ordering that this action be and hereby is DISMISSE D for failure to state a claim. Further ordering that the Clerk of Court document that this inmate has brought an action that was dismissed for failure to state a claim and that this inmate has incurred a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. §1915 (g). Further ordering that the Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections or his designee shall collect from plaintiff's prison trust account the $342.52 balance of the filing fee as designated in the order and that the Clerk of Court enter judgment accordingly. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff, Warden-WCI, AAG Corey Finkelmeyer) (dm)

March 7, 2012

Filing 10 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 3/7/12 that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of this Court the sum of $7.48 as an initial partial filing fee in this action. (cc: via USPS to plaintiff)(dm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Clarke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: John Clarke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Demetric Scott
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?