Staffa v. Pollard et al
Mark P Staffa |
William Pollard, David Burnett, P Sumnicht, Belinda Schrubbe and James Greer |
2:2013cv00005 |
January 2, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Dodge |
Rudolph T Randa |
Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 151 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 10/23/2015 DENYING 150 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Mark Staffa at Waupun Correctional Institution) (cb) |
Filing 148 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 8/25/2015. 81 Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment GRANTED. 136 Plaintiff's MOTION to remove clerk DENIED. 140 Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File amended response GRANTED. Wis. Dept. of Corrections to collect $499.75 balance of appeal fee in No. 14-2124 from plaintiff's prison trust account. (cc: all counsel)(cb) |
Filing 133 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 9/11/2014. 119 Plaintiff's MOTION to Appoint Counsel DENIED without prejudice; Plaintiff's request for leave to appeal GRANTED as to appeal of Court's 7/28/2014 Order denying request for inju nctive relief and DENIED as to appeal of Court's 7/28/2014 Order denying discovery-related motions and motion to convene jury; 129 Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis GRANTED. Plaintiff not required to pay initial par tial filing fee. Wis. Dept. of Corrections to collect $505 balance of appeal fee from plaintiff's prison trust account pursuant to 28 USC § 1915(b)(2). Proceedings stayed until such time as Court of Appeals has resolved plaintiff's appeal from Court's denial of injunctive relief. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Warden and Mark Staffa at Waupun Correctional Institution, PLRA Attorney at 7th Circuit)(cb) |
Filing 122 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 7/28/2014. 106 Plaintiff's MOTION for jury DENIED; 113 Plaintiff's MOTION for temporary restraining order/injunction DENIED; 115 Defendants' MOTION to quash subpoena GRANTED; 116 Plaintiff's MOTION for copy of subpoenaed evidence/oral argument of evidence DENIED. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Mark Staffa at Waupun Correctional Institution)(cb) |
Filing 68 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 1/3/2014. STAY LIFTED: Discovery due 3/28/2014; Dispositive Motions due 4/30/2014. 50 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction DENIED. 54 REQUEST for Qualified Protective Order/Compel Discovery DENIED. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Mark Staffa at Waupun Correctional Institution)(cb) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 5/31/2013 DENYING 9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order/Permanent Injunction; DENYING 16 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order/Permanent Injunction. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Mark Staffa at Waupun Correctional Institution)(cb) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 4/9/2013 GRANTING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Copies of this Order and plaintiff's complaint to be electronically sent to Wis. Dept. of Justice; Defendants to file responsive plead ing within 60 days of receipt of this Order; Dept. of Corrections shall collect $346.42 balance of filing fee in monthly payments from plaintiff's prison trust account. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Mark Staffa and Warden at Waupun Correctional Institution) (cb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.