Harris v. Hallisy et al
| Brian Ivy Scott Harris |
| John Morrisey, David Beth and Robert Hallisy |
| 2:2013cv00471 |
| April 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Kenosha |
| Rudolph T Randa |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 11/13/2013. Case DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (cc: via US mail to Brian Harris at Kenosha County Detention Center)(cb)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 8/26/2013. Effective 9/18/2013 this action to be dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution unless prior to that date plaintiff files amended complaint or establishes just cause for failure to do so. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Brian Harris at Kenosha County Detention Center)(cb)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 6/11/2013 GRANTING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. On or before 7/8/2013 Plaintiff to file amended pleading curing defects in original complaint (see Order for details). Kenosha County Sher iff to collect from Plaintiff's prison trust account the $347.07 balance of the filing fee. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Brian Harris at Kenosha County Detention Center, Kenosha County Sheriff, Corey Finkelmeyer-Asst. Atty. General) (cb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
