Santos v. Baenen et al
| Jose Luis Santos |
| Craig Nemetz, Benjamin Griffen, Peter Gavin, Michael Baenen, Marty Breen and Jean Liutey |
| 2:2013cv00606 |
| May 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Brown |
| Rudolph T Randa |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 2/20/2014 GRANTING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; DENYING as Moot 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel; DENYING as moot 11 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; DISMISSING thi s action pursuant to 28 USC §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim. Clerk of Court to document: that inmate brought action dismissed for failure to state a claim under 28 USC §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1) ; and that inmate has incurred a "strike" under 28 USC §1915(g). Plaintiff to pay the $336.33 balance of the filing fee to the Clerk of Court. The Court certifies that appeal from this matter would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 USC §1915(a)(3) unless plaintiff offers bona fide arguments supporting appeal. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to plaintiff and warden at Green Bay Correctional Institution)(cb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
