Mucha v. City of Milwaukee et al
| Jason R Mucha |
| City of Milwaukee, City of Milwaukee Employes' Retirement System, Bernard Allen, Jutiki Jackson and Donald Gaglione |
| 2:2014cv00303 |
| March 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Washington |
| William E Callahan |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 8/13/15 that the plaintiffs claims against defendants Jackson and Gaglione are DISMISSED. Further ordering that defendant ERSs motion for reconsideration 36 is DENIED. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
|
|
Filing
29
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 11/18/14 granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The motion is granted to the extent that the plaintiffs claims against the City of Milwaukee for unreasonable seizure and false imprisonment, his claim against Bernard Allen, and his claim for abuse of process against the ERS are dismissed. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Further denying 22 , 27 Motions to Seal. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/31/14 granting 23 Motion to Stay defendants discovery pending resolution of the motion for judgment on the pleadings. (cc: all counsel) (lls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
