Robert G Montgomery Family Trust v. Tesla Motors Inc Featured Case

Plaintiff alleged that Defendant Tesla Motors, Inc. failed or refused to provide the appropriate relief provided for by Wisconsin lemon law in a timely manner in regards to a 2013 Tesla S P sedan that has been out of service a total of 30 days or more due to warranty nonconformities.

Plaintiff: Robert G Montgomery Family Trust
Defendant: Tesla Motors Inc
Case Number: 2:2014cv00501
Filed: May 1, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Milwaukee
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2014 MEMORANDUM signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 7/7/14. The parties filed a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). By operation of that rule, this case has been dismissed. However, the parties also filed a proposed order containing language purporting to dismiss this case. That proposed order will not be signed. See Scott v. Delbert Servs. Corp., 973 F. Supp. 2d 949 (E.D. Wis. 2013). (cc: All Counsel) (dm)
July 7, 2014 MEMORANDUM signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 7/7/14. The parties filed a stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). By operation of that rule, this case has been dismissed. However, the parties also filed a proposed order containing language purporting to dismiss this case. That proposed order will not be signed. See Scott v. Delbert Servs. Corp., 973 F. Supp. 2d 949 (E.D. Wis. 2013). (cc: All Counsel)
July 2, 2014 Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Robert G Montgomery Family Trust. (Grzeskowiak, Susan)
June 18, 2014 NOTICE by the Court. In light of counsel's letter indicating the parties have settled, this case is closed for administrative purposes only pending receipt of final settlement paperwork.
June 18, 2014 NOTICE by the Court. In light of counsel's letter indicating the parties have settled, this case is closed for administrative purposes only pending receipt of final settlement paperwork. (dm)
June 17, 2014 Filing 8 LETTER from Attorney Grzeskowiak . (Grzeskowiak, Susan)
May 19, 2014 Filing 7 Refusal to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Tesla Motors Inc. (Sarskas, S)
May 16, 2014 Filing 6 Refusal to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Robert G Montgomery Family Trust. (Grzeskowiak, Susan)
May 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 5/9/14. Rule 16(b) telephone scheduling conference set for 6/27/2014 11:00 AM before Judge Lynn Adelman. The court will initiate the call. The participation of the attorney who will be handling the case is required and should be noted in the Rule 26(f) report together with the contact information. (cc: all counsel)(dm)
May 8, 2014 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) filed by Tesla Motors Inc. (Sarskas, S)
May 2, 2014 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Tesla Motors Inc. (Kaplan, Benjamin)
May 1, 2014 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin A Kaplan on behalf of Tesla Motors Inc. Attorney(s) appearing: J. Donald Best, S. Edward Sarskas and Benjamin A. Kaplan (Kaplan, Benjamin)
May 1, 2014 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Tesla Motors Inc from Milwaukee County Circuit Court, Case Number: 14-CV-2962 with attached state court documents. (Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-1882651) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet)
May 1, 2014 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Tesla Motors Inc from Milwaukee County Circuit Court, Case Number: 14-CV-2962 with attached state court documents. (Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-1882651) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaplan, Benjamin)
May 1, 2014 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our web site ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl)
May 1, 2014 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our web site ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robert G Montgomery Family Trust v. Tesla Motors Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert G Montgomery Family Trust
Represented By: Vincent P Megna
Represented By: Susan M Grzeskowiak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tesla Motors Inc
Represented By: S Edward Sarskas
Represented By: J Donald Best
Represented By: Benjamin A Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?