Lietz v. Matz et al
| Thaddeus M Lietz |
| John Matz, J B Van Hollen and Edward F Wall |
| 2:2014cv00944 |
| August 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Winnebago |
| Lynn Adelman |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/29/15 denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Clerk shall enter final judgment. I will not issue a certificate of appealability. Further ordering petitioners motion to deny responden ts enlargement of time 14 is DENIED as moot and petitioners motion to enlarge the record and motion for evidentiary hearing 15 are DENIED. Further ordering petitioners motion to open records 17 is DENIED, petitioners motion for extension of time 20 is DENIED as moot and that petitioners motion for scheduling 22 is DENIED. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to petitioner) (dm)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 12/5/14 that within 30 days of the date of this order respondent ANSWER the petition, showing cause, if any, why the writ should not issue. Further ordering that the parties shall abide by the schedule regarding the filing of briefs on the merits of petitioners claims set forth in the order. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to petitioner)(dm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
