Tisby v. Butler et al
Plaintiff: Barry Tisby, Jr
Defendant: Karen Butler, Dr Hammond and J Schroeder
Case Number: 2:2014cv01315
Filed: October 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Kenosha
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 8/28/15. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff)(dm)
June 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 48 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 6/24/15 denying as moot 37 Dr. Hammond and Rebecca Swansons Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 44 Karen Butlers Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 20 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot 23 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Further ordering that plaintiff may file a motion to amend the complaint and a proposed fourth amended complaint within twenty-one days of the date of this order. If plaintiff does not do so, then the first amended complaint 8 will remain the operative complaint in this action and all defendants must file a responsive pleading to that complaint. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff) (dm)
January 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 1/6/15 granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Further ordering that the complaint filed in Case Number 14-CV-1453 be filed as the amended complaint in this action. Further order ing that the initial partial filing fee paid in Case Number 14-CV-1453 ($65.68) be credited toward the payment of the filing fee in this case. Further ordering the United States Marshal to serve a copy of the amended complaint and this order up on the defendants and that defendants file a responsive pleading to the amended complaint. Further ordering the Kenosha County Sheriff to collect from plaintiffs prison trust account the $215.68 balance of the filing fee as set forth in the order. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff, Kenosha County Sheriff) (dm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tisby v. Butler et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barry Tisby, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karen Butler
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - 1983 Actions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr Hammond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J Schroeder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?