Cole v. Risperdal Manufacturer
Plaintiff: Reginald S Cole, Jr
Defendant: Risperdal Manufacturer
Case Number: 2:2015cv00057
Filed: January 16, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Dodge
Presiding Judge: Charles N Clevert
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 242 ORDER DENYING 241 Request for Mediation filed by Reginald S Cole, Jr, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 02/12/2019. The case is currently on appeal and this court has no jurisdiction to order mediation. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 236 ORDER DENYING 233 Motion to Supplement and DENYING 234 Motion for Leave to File an expert report, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 10/25/2018. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAIL. (cc: all counsel; Cole via U.S. Mail) (Griesbach, William)
March 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 219 ORDER denying 217 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint AND denying 218 Motion to Supplement Record, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 03/29/2018. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAIL. (cc: all counsel via efile and Cole via U.S. Mail) (Griesbach, William)
February 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 210 ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 2/21/2018 denying 207 Motion to Supplement the record on appeal and denying 208 Motion for Order allowing use of his release account to purchase transcripts. (cc: all counsel via CM/ECF, Reginald S Cole, Jr via U.S. Mail) (Griesbach, William)
December 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 179 ORDER granting 132 Motion for Summary Judgment. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Reginald Cole) (Griesbach, William)
August 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 08/02/2017, GRANTING 135 Motion to Strike plaintiffs expert witness disclosures; GRANTING, nunc pro tunc July 10, 2017, 144 Motion for Leave to respond to plaintiffs motion for reconsideration; and GRANTING 146 Motion to Strike plaintiffs third set of expert witness disclosures. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
July 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 149 ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 7/10/2017 DENYING 127 Motion for Plaintiff to be Transferred; DENYING 129 Request for Strict Liability or 90 Day Speedy Trial, GRANTING 131 Motion to Seal Document and GRANTING 143 Motion f or Extension of Time. Parties must file a declaration setting forward their respective states of citizenship within 21 days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this case. (cc: all counsel and via US Mail to Plaintiff) (Griesbach, William)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cole v. Risperdal Manufacturer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reginald S Cole, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Risperdal Manufacturer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?