Love v. Medical College of Wisconsin et al
| Robert B Love |
| Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Alfred C Nicolosi, Joseph E Kerschner, Mary A Papp, David C Warltier and Larry Lindenbaum |
| 2:2015cv00650 |
| May 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Milwaukee |
| Lynn Adelman |
| False Claims Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
322
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 6/26/20 that Dr. Pagel's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to the defamation claim arising from his conversation with Dr. Bowe, and DENIED with respect to all other claims. Dr. Lindenbaum& #039;s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to the defamation claim against him, and DENIED with respect to the tortious interference claim. Based on the plaintiff's representations, all remaining claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and for punitive damages are DISMISSED. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
|
|
Filing
186
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 6/11/18. Defendants' motions to convert Love's expedited motion for leave to amend his complaint into a non-expedited motion 150 , 151 and 152 are DENIED; Love's motion to strike defendants� 39; briefs in opposition to his expedited motion for leave to amend his complaint 165 is GRANTED, and the Clerk of Court shall STRIKE those briefs 157 , 161 , and 162 from the record; Love's expedited motion for leave to amend his complain t 147 is GRANTED, and the Clerk of Court shall file Love's third amended complaint [147-2] but shall do so UNDER SEAL; Love's motion to strike affirmative defenses pleaded in defendants' answers to his second amended complaint 125 and Froedtert's motion for clarification of my order granting Loves motion for leave to file his second amended complaint 127 are DENIED as moot; Love's and Gahnz's motions to quash MCW's subpoena commanding Lawton & Cates S.C. to produce materials related to its representation of Love 131 and 133 are GRANTED; Gahnz's motion for a protective order prohibiting further attempts by MCW to elicit information from Lawton & Cates about its representation of Love 131 is DENIED without prejudice. The parties' motions to seal documents filed as exhibits to Love's expedited motion for leave to amend his complaint 148 , 154 , and 156 are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as discussed above, and the Cler k of Court shall publicly file Exhibit 14 to Loves motion [147-15], but all other exhibits to that motion that were filed under seal shall remain sealed. Within 7 days after the date of this order, Love shall publicly file a version of his third amen ded complaint in which all individual identifiers from personal health information are redacted, as discussed above; MCW's motion to claw back documents filed as exhibits to Love's expedited motion for leave to amend his complaint 154 is DENIED; Love's motion to seal three exhibits filed in opposition to MCW's motion to claw back documents 173 is DENIED, and the Clerk of Court shall publicly file Exhibits D-F to the Declaration of Alexander Hess [172-4 to -6]; MCW's motion to seal two exhibits filed in response to Loves expedited motion for leave to amend his complaint 159 is GRANTED; and MCW's motion for a protective order prohibiting depositions of the parties and their employees until the court resolves Love's expedited motion for leave to amend his complaint 182 is DENIED as moot. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
|
|
Filing
84
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 12/29/16 GRANTING Loves motion for leave to file an amended complaint 79 , except as described herein. Further ordering the Clerk of Court to file Loves amended complaint (found at ECF No. 79-1). Further ordering that the parties joint motion to modify the schedule 82 is GRANTED. The parties shall serve their amended Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures and amended interrogatories and requests for production within 14 days after all defendants have responded to plaintiffs amended complaint. Responses to the amended written discovery shall be due 30 days after service. Further ordering that Loves motion to schedule a telephonic status conference 83 is DENIED. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
|
|
Filing
69
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 5/31/16 that MCWs motion for reconsideration 61 is DENIED in part. MCW may submit an amended redacted version of the complaint redacting only patient age, sex, and dates of medical procedures. Fur ther ordering that MCWs motion to stay proceedings 62 is DENIED. Further ordernig that MCWs motion to restrict pending appeal 64 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall: a. Restrict access to the following documents to case participants only, pendi ng further order from the court: Complaint (ECF No. 2); Answer (ECF No. 19); Redacted Complaint (ECF No. 52); Letter Ex. 1 (ECF No. 53-1); and Redacted Complaint (ECF No. 55).b. Unseal all other documents filed in this case so that they are publicly available. Finally ordering that a telephonic Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) scheduling conference will be held on June 14, 2016 at 11:30 a.m. The court will initiate the call. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
|
|
Filing
51
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 4/22/16 that the parties motions to seal/restrict (ECF Nos. 1, 5, 8, 23, 26, 28, 37, 40) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk shall make all documents filed in this case, except for the complaint 2 and MCWs answer 19 , publicly available. Further ordering that within seven (7) days of this order, plaintiff shall publicly file his proposed redacted version of the complaint, including a publicly available copy of Exhibit A, MCW de fendants shall publicly file a redacted version of their answer and the parties shall publicly file the chain of correspondence they sent to my proposed order box. Further ordering that plaintiffs unopposed motion for leave to file a surreply 42 i s GRANTED. The Clerk shall file the proposed surreply. Further ordering that MCW defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings 21 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and that MCW defendants motion to strike allegations 21 is DENIED. Further ordering that FMLHs motion to dismiss 30 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
