Horicon Foods Inc v. Gehl Foods LLC
||Horicon Foods Inc
||Gehl Foods LLC
||June 8, 2015
||Wisconsin Eastern District Court
||XX US, Outside State
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 12, 2016
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/12/16 that the parties new motions to seal (ECF Nos. 100 through 102) are GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall unseal all documents that were previously sealed but that are not identified as confidential in the new motions. The parties have submitted redacted versions of the documents containing confidential material. The Clerk of Court shall keep the unredacted versions sealed but make the redacted versions available for public viewing. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
|September 15, 2016
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/15/16 that Gehls motion for summary judgment 27 is GRANTED. Further ordering that Schumacker and Dairy=Bonds motion for summary judgment 76 is GRANTED. Further ordering that Schumacker and Da iry=Bonds motion to dismiss 65 is DENIED as MOOT. Finally ordering that the parties motions to seal 55 , 79 , 85 & 89 are DENIED. However, the Clerk of Court shall continue to keep the materials associated with those motions sealed. A part y that wishes to keep any part of the materials sealed for longer than 21 days from the date of this order must file a motion that complies with General Local Rule 79(d) and Civil Local Rule 26(e)(f) before the expiration of the 21-day period. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?