Johnson v. Caterpillar Global Mining LLC et al
Plaintiff: Bert Johnson
Defendant: Kimberly Croxton and Caterpillar Global Mining LLC
Case Number: 2:2015cv00718
Filed: June 15, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Dane
Presiding Judge: Pamela Pepper
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2016 Filing 9 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk; this matter is DISMISSED without prejudice (cc: all counsel, pltf)(vkb)
March 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 8 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 3/24/2016 DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (cc: all counsel; by US Mail to Plaintiff)(pwm)
January 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DECISION and ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 1/19/2016 DENYING AS MOOT #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, SCREENING Plaintiff's Complaint, and DIRECTING Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint on or Before Friday, February 19, 2016. (cc: all counsel and copy sent to the plaintiff by US Mail on January 19, 2016.) (kgw)
December 16, 2015 Filing 6 LETTER from plaintiff requesting status; letter and docket sent (Attachments: #1 Letter from Clerk in Response)(vkb)
June 29, 2015 FILING FEE Received: $400, receipt number MK468-053058. (jcl)
June 26, 2015 Filing 5 REFUSAL to Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Bert Johnson. (djd)
June 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 6/19/2015 that on or before 7/20/2015 plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $ 46.83 as an initial partial filing fee in this action. (cc: all counsel; by US Mail to plaintiff and Warden at Oakhill Correctional Institution)(pwm)
June 16, 2015 Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days (djd)
June 15, 2015 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bert Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Prison Trust Account Statement)This document and/or certain attachments are restricted to case participants and attorneys of record should use their efiling login and password to view this document(djd)
June 15, 2015 Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT by Bert Johnson. (Filing Fee not paid) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(djd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Caterpillar Global Mining LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kimberly Croxton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caterpillar Global Mining LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bert Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?