Naranjo Apolinar v Schmidt

Naranjo Apolinar v Schmidt

Plaintiff:	Brian Naranjo Apolinar
Defendant:	Dale Schmidt
Case Number:	2:2015cv00947
Filed:	August 7, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office:	Milwaukee Office
County:	Dodge
Presiding Judge:	Rudolph T Randa
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 17, 2015	Filing 16 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 11/17/2015. 2 Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis GRANTED. 9 Plaintiff's MOTION to appoint counsel DENIED as moot. Plaintiff to submit $317.52 balance of filing fee to Clerk of Court. Action DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim; Clerk of Court to document that inmate brought action that was dismissed for failure to state a claim und er 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1); Clerk of Court to document that inmate has incurred a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Court certifies any appeal from this matter would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) unless plaintiff offers bonafide arguments supporting appeal. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Brian Naranjo Apolinar; Corey Finkelmeyer, Asst. AG)(cb)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 17, 2015

Filing 16 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 11/17/2015. 2 Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis GRANTED. 9 Plaintiff's MOTION to appoint counsel DENIED as moot. Plaintiff to submit $317.52 balance of filing fee to Clerk of Court. Action DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim; Clerk of Court to document that inmate brought action that was dismissed for failure to state a claim und er 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1); Clerk of Court to document that inmate has incurred a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Court certifies any appeal from this matter would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) unless plaintiff offers bonafide arguments supporting appeal. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Brian Naranjo Apolinar; Corey Finkelmeyer, Asst. AG)(cb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Naranjo Apolinar v Schmidt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Naranjo Apolinar
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Dale Schmidt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?