Berry v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Wisconsin Eastern District Berry v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

Berry v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

Plaintiff:	Akida Berry
Defendant:	State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Case Number:	2:2015cv00952
Filed:	August 10, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office:	Milwaukee Office
County:	Milwaukee
Presiding Judge:	Pamela Pepper
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	12 U.S.C. § 635
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 9, 2019	Filing 65 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 5/9/2019 GRANTING 41 defendant's motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's breach of contract and promissory estoppel claims. Parties to file modified Rule 26 Discovery Plan by 6/14/2019. (cc: all counsel) (cb)
June 22, 2017	Filing 52 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 6/22/2017. 47 Plaintiff's Second MOTION for Extension of Time and Deadlines DENIED. 49 Plaintiff's First MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Summary Judgment Motion DENIED AS MOOT. 50 Pl aintiff's Second MOTION to Enlarge Time to File Response to Summary Judgment Motion DENIED AS MOOT. 51 Plaintiff's Third MOTION to Enlarge Time to File Response to Summary Judgment Motion GRANTED; Plaintiff to file response to defendant's summary judgment by end of day 6/30/2017; No further extensions will be granted. If defendant wishes to file reply brief, it shall do so by end of day 7/21/2017. (cc: all counsel)(cb)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 9, 2019

Filing 65 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 5/9/2019 GRANTING 41 defendant's motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's breach of contract and promissory estoppel claims. Parties to file modified Rule 26 Discovery Plan by 6/14/2019. (cc: all counsel) (cb)

June 22, 2017

Filing 52 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 6/22/2017. 47 Plaintiff's Second MOTION for Extension of Time and Deadlines DENIED. 49 Plaintiff's First MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Summary Judgment Motion DENIED AS MOOT. 50 Pl aintiff's Second MOTION to Enlarge Time to File Response to Summary Judgment Motion DENIED AS MOOT. 51 Plaintiff's Third MOTION to Enlarge Time to File Response to Summary Judgment Motion GRANTED; Plaintiff to file response to defendant's summary judgment by end of day 6/30/2017; No further extensions will be granted. If defendant wishes to file reply brief, it shall do so by end of day 7/21/2017. (cc: all counsel)(cb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berry v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Akida Berry
Represented By:	Michael M Krill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Represented By:	Joshua J Bryant
Represented By:	Mark D Malloy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?