Lilly v. Department of Defense et al
Plaintiff: Chrisandra Lilly
Defendant: Department of Defense, Milw Cryolife Inc and Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Inc
Case Number: 2:2015cv01458
Filed: December 7, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Milwaukee
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 1/23/17 that this action is DISMISSED for lack of diligence. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff)(dm)
December 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 12/28/16 GRANTING CHWs motion to dismiss 29 . Further ordering that Lillys amended complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to amend. Lilly may file a second amended complaint by Jan uary 20, 2017 curing the defects described above. If she does not, I will dismiss this action for lack of diligence under this courts Civil Local Rule 41(c). Further ordering that Lilly may not proceed with any claims on behalf of her daughter or her daughters estate unless an attorney admitted to practice in this court appears on Lillys behalf. Further ordering that CryoLife, Inc.s motion to dismiss 31 is DENIED as moot. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff) (dm)
May 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 5/16/16 that Childrens Hospital of Wisconsins motion for more definitive statement 6 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before June 17, 2016. If plaintiff fails to do so, h er case will be dismissed for lack of diligence under Civil L.R. 41(c). Further ordering that Cryolifes motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim 15 are DENIED without prejudice. Further ordering that the Department of Defenses motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and motion for summary judgment 22 are DENIED without prejudice. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to plaintiff) (dm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lilly v. Department of Defense et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chrisandra Lilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Defense
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Milw Cryolife Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?