Gutierrez Urban v. Department of Homeland Security
| Jose Ruben Gutierrez Urban |
| 2:2016cv00304 |
| March 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Dodge |
| Rudolph T Randa |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
Order Consolidating Cases signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 3/28/2016. Case consolidated with 16-C-303 as a § 2241 action; all future filings to be made in 16-C-303. Dale J. Schmidt added as respondent, Department of Homeland Security DISMISSE D. 2 Petitioner's MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis DENIED. By 4/28/2016 Gutierrez must pay $5 filing fee and file amended § 2241 petition (in 16-C-303) using enclosed form. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Jose Gutierrez at Dodge County Detention Center)(cb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gutierrez Urban v. Department of Homeland Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jose Ruben Gutierrez Urban | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
