Metalcraft of Mayville Inc v. The Toro Company et al
Metalcraft of Mayville Inc |
The Toro Company and Exmark Manufacturing Co Inc |
2:2016cv00544 |
May 5, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Waukesha |
Rudolph T Randa |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 2/28/17 that defendants motion for oral argument 74 & 75 is DENIED. Further ordering that defendants motion to seal 73 is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall make the relevant documents publicly available. Further ordering that Scags motion to strike 77 is DENIED. (cc: all counsel) (dm) |
Filing 69 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 11/18/16 that Scags motion to strike 67 and request for an extension of time is DENIED. (cc: all counsel) (dm) |
Filing 47 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 8/18/16 that defendants motion to dismiss 19 is DENIED. Further ordering that defendants motion to stay 32 is DENIED. Further ordering that plaintiffs motion to set bond and enter an injunction order 37 is GRANTED. Bond is set at $1,000,000 and should be posted within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. Defendants are enjoined from making, using, selling, and offering to sell lawnmowers equipped with the infringing platform su spension system in accordance with Judge Randas August 1, 2016 Decision and Order, ECF No. 30. Further ordering that defendants motion for leave to file a declaration 44 is GRANTED. Further ordering that plaintiffs motion for leave to file a reply 45 is GRANTED. (cc: all counsel) (dm) |
Filing 30 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper for Rudolph T Randa on 8/1/2016 GRANTING 2 Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction precluding the Toro Company and Exmark Manufacturing Co., Inc., from making, using, selling, and offering to sell lawnmowers equipped with platform suspension systems that infringe Scags patent, U.S. Patent No. 8,186,475, on the condition that Scag posts adequate security. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c). (cc: all counsel) (lz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.