Patterson v. Foster
| Brian Patterson |
| Brian Foster |
| 2:2016cv00745 |
| June 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Dodge |
| David E Jones |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 12/19/2022; IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner Brian A. Pattersons motion for relief from judgment, ECF No. 54 is DENIED. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Brian Patterson at Fox Lake Correctional Institution )(bx)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 9/26/2022. 41 and 48 Petitioner's Motions for Leave to File Oversized Briefs are GRANTED. 42 Petitioner's Motion for Immediate Release on PR Bond is DENIED as moot. 44 and 45 Respondent's Motions for Extensions of Time are GRANTED. 47 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. 15 Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. CASE DISMISSED with prejudice. See Order. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Brian Patterson at Fox Lake Correctional Institution)(jm)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 2/22/2021. 21 Petitioner's Motion to Reopen Case and for Leave to File Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED; 15 Petitioner's Amended Petition to be the OPERATIVE Petition. 16 Petitioner's Motion to Vacate Consent to Magistrate Judge and 18 Petitioner's Motion to Vacate Stay and Abeyance are DENIED as moot. Copy of 15 Petitioner's Amended Petition and this Order to be electronically SENT to Wiscon sin DOJ for service on Respondent; DOJ to NOTIFY Court within 21 days if it will not accept service for Respondent. Within 30 days, Respondent to file motion to dismiss or answer Amended Petition. IF RESPONDENT FILES ANSWER, briefing to proceed as fo llows: Petitioner's brief in support of his Amended Petition due within 60 days of filing of Respondent's answer; Respondent's opposition brief due within 60 days of service of Petitioner's brief or 120 days of this Order if Petit ioner does not file a brief; Petitioner's reply due within 30 days of filing of Respondent's brief. IF RESPONDENT FILES MOTION, briefing to proceed as follows: Petitioner's brief in opposition due within 30 days of filing of Respondent's motion; Respondent's reply due within 15 days of filing of Petitioner's brief. Civil L.R. 7(f) governs page limitations. See Order. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Brian Patterson at Fox Lake Correctional Institution)(jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Patterson v. Foster | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Brian Patterson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Brian Foster | |
| Represented By: | Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
