Antepenko v. Litscher et al
William Antepenko |
Jon E Litscher, Judy Smith, Jenny Delvaux, Christine Zanon, Rex Smith and Joseph Brooks |
2:2016cv01233 |
September 14, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Winnebago |
Pamela Pepper |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 2/1/2018. 24 Defendants' MOTION for summary judgment GRANTED. 34 Plaintiff's MOTION to supplement, MOTION to disclose electronically stored information, MOTION to amend/correct comp laint, MOTION for extension of time, MOTION for reconsideration DENIED. 35 Plaintiff's MOTION for temporary restraining order, MOTION for preliminary injunction DENIED. (cc: all counsel, via mail to William Antepenko at Oshkosh Correctional Institution)(cb) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 1/10/2017 GRANTING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee; DENYING 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel; and SCREENING the complaint. (cc: all counsel; by US mail to plaintiff and warden at Oshkosh CI) (pwm) |
Filing 10 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/23/2016 GRANTING 7 Plaintiff's motion to pay his initial partial filing fee with funds from his release account. (cc: all counsel; by US Mail to Plaintiff and Warden at Oshkosh CI) (pwm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.