Santos v. Kartman et al
Plaintiff: Jose Luis Santos
Defendant: Security Director Kartman, Iverson, Gary Boughton and Ellen Ray
Case Number: 2:2016cv01362
Filed: October 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Dodge
Presiding Judge: William E Duffin
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 3/16/2018. 20 Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment GRANTED. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Jose Luis Santos at Wisconsin Secure Program Facility)(cb)
January 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 1/11/2018. 30 Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of order denying motion to compel DENIED. 36 Defendants' motion for protective order GRANTED. 43 Plaintiff's motion to strike declaration DENIED. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Jose Luis Santos at Wisconsin Secure Program Facility) (cb)
August 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 8/14/2017. 29 Plaintiff's MOTION for extension of time DENIED as moot. 30 Plaintiff's MOTION for reconsideration of that part of the court's 6/30/2017 order denying the appointment of counsel DENIED. Within 21 days, defendants to deliver copy of confidential investigation report requested by plaintiff to the court's chambers for in camera review. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Jose Luis Santos at Wisconsin Secure Program Facility)(cb)
June 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 6/30/2017 DENYING 15 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and DENYING without prejudice Plaintiff's request for counsel. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Jose Santos at Wisconsin Secure Program Facility) (cb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santos v. Kartman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Luis Santos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Security Director Kartman
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - 1983 Actions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Iverson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Boughton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ellen Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?