Brown v. Foster
Ennis Lee Brown |
Brian Foster |
2:2016cv01497 |
November 8, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Dodge |
Pamela Pepper |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/17/2021 DENYING 101 petitioner's motion to reopen case. (cc: all counsel and mailed to Ennis Brown at Wisconsin Secure Program Facility)(cb) |
Filing 98 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 1/6/2020 DECLINING TO ISSUE certificate of appealability. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Ennis Brown at Wisconsin Secure Program Facility)(cb) |
Filing 91 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 11/1/2019. 84 Petitioner's motion for evidentiary hearing DENIED. 85 Petitioner's motion for reconsideration DENIED. 86 Petitioner's motion for emergency release DENIED. 87 Petitioner's motion to appeal without prepaying appellate filing fee GRANTED. 89 Petitioner's motion for review and evidentiary hearing DENIED. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Ennis Brown at Wisconsin Secure Program Facility) (cb) |
Filing 82 ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 5/28/2019. Petition for writ of habeas corpus DISMISSED without prejudice because it contains both exhausted and unexhausted claims. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Ennis Brown at Wisconsin Secure Program Facility)(cb) |
Filing 59 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 2/27/2018. 30 Petitioner's Motion for Recusal DENIED. 40 43 45 57 Petitioner's Motions for Release Pending §2254 Relief DENIED. 31 Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing DENIED without prejudice. 32 Petitioner's Motion to Enlarge the Record DENIED without prejudice. 33 Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment DENIED. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Ennis Brown at Waupun Correctional Institution) (cb) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 5/22/2017 GRANTING 15 Petitioner's motion to amend the petition; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 16 Motion to appoint counsel; GRANTING 17 Motion to clarify screening order; and DENYING 21 22 Motions to release petitioner pending 2254 relief. The court DIRECTS the clerk of court to docket the petitioner's amended petition [15-1] as the operative petition. Please see the order at pages 11-12 for briefing deadlines. (cc: all counsel; by US Mail to petitioner)(pwm) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 1/9/2017 SCREENING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ennis Lee Brown and ORDERING the Respondent to answer or otherwise respond. (cc: all counsel; by US Mail to petitioner)(pwm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brown v. Foster | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Ennis Lee Brown | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Brian Foster | |
Represented By: | Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.