EastStar Solutions Ltd et al v. Owens et al
| EastStar Solutions Ltd and Cui Enterprises Ltd |
| Ronald Owens, Vanowens Footwear and Owens Sales Ltd |
| 2:2016cv01551 |
| November 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Milwaukee |
| Nancy Joseph |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 6/25/18. IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the defendants' counterclaims 32 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants' motion for summary judgment on t he plaintiffs' claims 49 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration based on newly discovered evidence 81 is DENIED. FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion for relief pursuant to Rule 17(a) 82 is DENIED. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
|
|
Filing
80
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 4/28/18 denying 69 Motion for Order; denying 70 Motion to Withdraw Motion; denying 73 Motion to Amend/Correct; and denying 74 Motion for Discovery. IT IS ORDERED that, on or before May 21, 2018, the parties shall file either (a) stipulated facts or (b) supplemental memoranda and supporting evidence, to support their respective allegations that I may exercise jurisdiction over their state-law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
